<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/serendipity/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>

<feed 
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/feeds/atom.xml" rel="self" title="Proving the Obviously Untrue" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/"                        rel="alternate"    title="Proving the Obviously Untrue" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="Proving the Obviously Untrue" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">Proving the Obviously Untrue</title>
    <subtitle type="html">Maths, Software, Hardware, Martial Arts and more</subtitle>
    
    <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/</id>
    <updated>2008-08-27T22:53:13Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="1.3.1-1">Serendipity 1.3.1-1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/59-If-you-want-fish,-go-to-the-Caribbean.html" rel="alternate" title="&quot;If you want fish, go to the Caribbean&quot; " />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-27T22:28:48Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-27T22:53:13Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=59</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=59</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/59-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">&quot;If you want fish, go to the Caribbean&quot; </title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                We went to Alcudia on a family holiday this year, and spent a lot of the time around the pool watching Aimee enjoy her swimming. One day, we decided we would take a boat trip from the ones at the harbour. There was only one that appealed - which was essentially a glass bottom boat. We took it because we thought Aimee would enjoy seeing the fish, and it was relatively short. It was around €42 for the three of us. Not a huge amount, but not that cheap for a two hour trip.<br /><br />

<div class="serendipity_imageComment_left" style="width: 83px"><div class="serendipity_imageComment_img"><a class='serendipity_image_link' href='http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/uploads/fish.jpg'><!-- s9ymdb:20 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="83" height="110"  src="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/uploads/fish.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt="" /></a></div><div class="serendipity_imageComment_txt">The advert for our trip</div></div>
The boat was a catamaran, and both sides of each hull had rather short windows in them. There wasn't a lot of space considering the number of people on board. We had a quick look downstairs, and there wasn't anything to see. We spent around 30 minutes picking people up from other piers along the coast and then headed off. Periodically we would check downstairs; nothing to see. Never mind, plenty of time yet. We went out around the coast for quite some time, travelling at a fair lick so there again, was nothing to see. Finally we stopped briefly (a minute or two at a time in a few coves). I saw one fish, and the seaweed on the bottom. Aimee, who you will recall was the reason for the trip saw no fish at all. The whole journey was just viewing a blue rectangle. The only life visible most of the time were people in the other hull also looking for something. Well that was it. and back to port.<br /><br />

Now Karen and I have been on a submarine, and I think "submarine vision" was kind of pushing it, so Karen went to complain at the desk. The girl explained the manager was not available, and another man in the booth laughingly said "you didn't pay for the fish". Uh, but we did, and I think from the poster, it's clear we did. I'm a diver, and have spent many hours on boats, I'm not that excited about them to pay for a two hour round trip.<br /><br />

The next day Karen got the hotel reception to call the manager, one "Toni Capllonch Alenyar". He wouldn't speak to her at all, referring conversation through his receptionist. After lots of nonsense including putting the phone down on us (causing our angry receptionist to phone him straight back), he eventually relayed through his receptionist "If you want fish, go the Caribbean". Another hang up, after which they no longer answered the phone.<br /><br />

So we saw more fish at the beach than we did on the "Submarine Vision" trip, and given the reply, it looks a bit like a deliberate deception, but hey, take his advice, I've been to the Caribbean, and they know how to do trips to see fish. For that matter I'd avoid his other trips too, maybe they aren't quite as they are advertised either. I've at least had the pleasure of depriving them of some more business. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/58-Nokia-N95.html" rel="alternate" title="Nokia N95" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-08-22T09:42:42Z</published>
        <updated>2008-08-25T00:09:54Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=58</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=58</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/6-hardware" label="hardware" term="hardware" />
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/3-review" label="review" term="review" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/58-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Nokia N95</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Just before we went on our family holiday, I went with Karen to look at new phones for me and for her. Karen liked the look of the phone, but wanted it in a specific colour and was prepared to wait to order that. I decided I liked the look of the Nokia N95. The iPhone is not an attractive prospect for me, apparently it's a poor phone, a poor camera and there even seem to be issues with its sound. So no amount of astounding user interface makes up for that. The <a href="http://samsungomnia.com/">Samsung Omnia</a>, coming out soon, looks really interesting but it runs Windows CE, and that's a big minus for me. I'm very interested in the <a href="http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner">OpenMoko FreeRunner neo</a> which can, among other things run my favourite operating system <a href="http://www.debian.org">Debian</a>, after the great work done at debconf. Apparently it's not however a useful and reliable phone, which is definitely a minus too. Maybe next generation, and I can't hack everything at once.<br /><br />

The Nokia N95 runs <a href="http://www.symbian.com/">Symbian</a> which is a plus. I was warned that the battery life was poor and given the choice between the conventional model with an 8 Gb card, and the N95 8Gb which has the memory totally internalised. The former also has a shutter cover for the lens, which was discarded in the latter to allow a larger battery. I wanted the cover. I got the handset from <a href="http://www.phones4u.co.uk/">Phones4u</a> and it's an O2 handset, who I have my contract with. It took a while to put the order though, so they gave me £50 for waiting. So, seriously, I got the free upgrade, the memory card, a screen protector and £50 in my hand. The bundled accessories are good, a USB cable (like the much criticised N800 it doesn't seem to do charging) a car charger, a tiny regular charger (same as the N800 actually) and the usual ear phones, with a small control panel on a cable for the sound.<br /><br /> <br /><a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/58-Nokia-N95.html#extended">Continue reading "Nokia N95"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/57-In-OHare-Airport-Bring-entertainment....html" rel="alternate" title="In O'Hare Airport? Bring entertainment..." />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-31T18:28:26Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-31T18:28:26Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=57</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=57</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/57-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">In O'Hare Airport? Bring entertainment...</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I'm back from Chicago for a while now. On the last day (which was a Sunday (13th June)) I walked with some colleagues from our hotel to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnificent_Mile">Magnificent Mile</a> where, underneath the John Hancock building, we had brunch at the Cheesecake Factory; food was good but the service was quite slow and consequently two of our number were tight for their flights. I walked back with them to the hotel, at a slowish pace for me, but probably rather two fast for them (on my own, I walk at quite a speed). Once I said my farewell's to them at the hotel, I had some more time to kill on what was a sunny, windy day in downtown Chicago. Incidentally, there are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windy_City%2C_Origin_of_Name_(Chicago)">rival theories behind the nick name "Windy City"</a>.<br /><br />

I walked in the opposite direction from the hotel towards <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears_tower">Sears Tower</a> and, after taking a little time to find the entrance that was actually open for the sky deck, I found the queue to be 45 minutes. While I was mildly interested in going up, I felt this might be a bit tight if it got any longer as I was heading for my own flight, and anyway, I'd previously made it up the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hancock_Center">John Hancock Centre</a> as I mentioned <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/56-Trip-to-Chicago.html">previously</a>. So I wandered around the streets for a while, but rapidly found that everything on that side of the city was closed for Sunday, and I didn't particularly feel any desire to walk back to the magnificent mile again. So I thought I'd head to the airport a little early, and get sorted out, and look around anything they had there.<br /><br />

Now, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27hare_Airport">O'Hare</a>, like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathrow">Heathrow</a> is one of the busiest airports in the world. Plenty of people complain about Heathrow, but I must confess, I kind of like it, you're as likely to have transport problems in any airport in the world. Like my <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/56-Trip-to-Chicago.html">previously mentioned problems in Dublin</a>, but at least in Dublin there were a few shops, and restaurants, and in Heathrow I can browse around for a long time without getting bored.<br /><br />

O'Hare is just plain dull. I got there in good time, checked in, declined the offer of 700 USD to upgrade to first class and saw an aisle leading to the security section, on either side there were around two shops / diners or whatever. I bought a few souvenirs in one of the shops while I watched the huge queue, and by the time I'd come out there was a much shorter queue. There seemed to be very little to do on that side, so I figured, that like many airports, it had more on the "air-side". I waited to get through security, and on the other side located my gate. I saw a modest sort of news stand, it sold some magazines, duty free cigarettes, wine and some travel adapters, along with a small selection of drinks and snacks. There was an identical one on the other side of security. I walked all the way around the gates and back, and realised this was it... absolutely all there was. I would have bought a Coke, but they only sold Pepsi, so I opted for a Gatorade Fruit Punch which proudly declared on the label the lack of any past association with any fruit. Then I sat down and was just plain bored. I had been kind of hoping to buy a <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/search?ie=UTF8&keywords=samsung+t10&tag=mycroft16-21&index=blended&linkCode=ur2&camp=1634&creative=6738">Samsung T10 mp3 player</a> on my travels, I'd bought one for Karen for her birthday (yes, it works with Linux), but this was one of the few airports in the world I've been to, where they had nothing like that on sale.<br /><br />

So, shop somewhere else, and be prepared to be bored. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/56-Trip-to-Chicago.html" rel="alternate" title="Trip to Chicago" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-07-11T03:21:49Z</published>
        <updated>2008-07-11T03:21:49Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=56</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=56</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/56-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Trip to Chicago</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Yesterday I set off from Banbridge around 9 am to get the aircoach to Dublin airport, since I'd been advised to arrive 3.5 hours before departure at
2:30 pm. I went through security pretty quickly, and shortly therafter I cleared US immigration in the airport, which was great, and I must say more
friendly than my experience of US immigration in the past. At just after 2 pm they told us all to get out and go back up, so we had to have our
passports unstamped and our visas uninspected. Fun.<br /><br />

Turned out the radar was down in the airport and lots of flights were being cancelled. The delay was a minor irritation for me, I was travelling alone
and without an ongoing connection, but it did mean around 3 hours of standing around (there were no seats left) waiting to find out if my flight would be
cancelled. In the end, the flight want ahead albeit with another delay on the tarmac. There was nothing reassuring about taking off in a fog bound airport
where the radar still was at "limited" capacity, whatever that meant.<br /><br />

The flight itself was pretty good. I hadn't flown Aer Lingus before, it was an A330 with individual media on demand screens, so, especially as I was on
my own I was able to kill the time watching video content the whole journey. The only considerable irritation was the staff on PA had a Columbo like
capacity to come back on-line with "another thing", frequently to repeat the same information about shopping or such like over and over again. Likewise
they had a capacity to interrupt the video with text on the screen, which could not be dismissed until it timed out. They did this all too frequently, to
repeat what had already been said on the PA, and often riddled with spelling and grammatical errors.<br /><br />

So I arrived late in Chicago, but not before flying in with a great view of the city on the left; and when I got to the hotel, the view from the front
door was equally impressive.<br /><br />

This morning I tried hard to get myself into the new timezone, so I stayed up till around midnight local time, and got up around 6:30 am, sorted out
the papers from the case and so on. The hotel has good, easy wireless access, so that's great. I left the hotel around 7:30 am to go on a shopping trip
for Karen, but also to see the sights along the way navigating with the usual woeful faded black and white photocopy of a colour map.
Many of the shops didn't open to 10 am which was a bit of a pain, but I was the first up the
John Hancock centre observatory this morning at 9 am. It does offer stunning panaromas of the city, and you go up in what is proclaimed to be the fastest
elevator in North America - it certainly is fast. I think the observatory is in the 94th floor or something similar.<br /><br />

On the way down the lift tells me that the John Hancock centre is "the world's most recognised building". Now steady on... I find that very unlikely.
I didn't even know it existed until yesterday (though I knew about Sears, and I know who John Hancock was). I would doubt the building could even
claim to be in the top 10 most recognised buildings. Perhaps this is a limited definition of "world".<br /><br />

I don't have talks to go to today, just to register and go to a reception, so I'm taking advantage of the time to see the city a bit, and then I'll go back to the hotel for a swim. It's hot here...  
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/55-Debian-GNULinux-on-Toshiba-Portege-R500.html" rel="alternate" title="Debian GNU/Linux on Toshiba Portege R500" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-19T16:42:53Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-26T13:05:09Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=55</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=55</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/6-hardware" label="hardware" term="hardware" />
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/3-review" label="review" term="review" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/55-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Debian GNU/Linux on Toshiba Portege R500</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                This week I got my hands on a Toshiba Portege R500 for work. It's brilliant to have a laptop with a decent battery once again. Here are some thoughts on the hardware, and installing Linux.<br /><br />

The first thing I did was cut through the label on the box that makes it clear that no refund is possible for bundled software you don't want, including the operating system. This beast came with Windows Vista Business edition, which I could happily live without. For now I didn't perform a full exorcism, but only shrunk the Vista partition right back. I have some consultancy jobs which might make it handy to leave Vista there for now.<br /><br />

The hardware is brilliant, light (under 1 kg) while still packing quite a punch, dual core CPU, 2 Gig RAM and 160 Gig hard disk. I didn't want the extra expenditure for a solid state disk, and I wanted the space too. Some reviews mentioned the heat and fan noise, but both are hugely reduced from my Sony Vaio so I'm more than happy.<br /><br />

I burnt a new <a href="http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/">Debian AMD64 net install</a> disk with the current testing (Lenny) and the second beta version of the installer. I booted off the CD and began the install, having previously so configured the BIOS from within Windows, there was no obvious key to press to change the boot, although I think F12 will do it in retrospect. First thing to note, a really long delay after the kernel declares itself ready and the installer resumes made me think it had crashed. Be patient. The main Debian install went very well, smoothly and quickly. I used the partition editor to shrink the Vista partition to 40 Gig for now. One minor quibble, Debian offers a quick solution for an entire encrypted disk, but not such an option with the remaining space. I don't yet understand that process well enough so I have left it unencrypted for now, and will do it manually later. Most of my working content is actually in SVN repositories so it's easy to rebuild from scratch should I choose to. <br /><a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/55-Debian-GNULinux-on-Toshiba-Portege-R500.html#extended">Continue reading "Debian GNU/Linux on Toshiba Portege R500"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/54-Leaked-EU-code.html" rel="alternate" title="Leaked EU code" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-14T11:13:41Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-14T11:13:41Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=54</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=54</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/54-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Leaked EU code</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <div class="bb-code-title">CODE:</div><div class="bb-code">/&#42;&#42;
&#42;&#160;attempt&#160;to&#160;ratify&#160;treaty
&#42;&#160;@param&#160;input&#160;the&#160;treaty&#160;to&#160;put&#160;before&#160;the&#160;"people"
&#42;&#160;@return&#160;boolean&#160;true&#160;on&#160;success,&#160;false&#160;otherwise
&#42;/
boolean&#160;ratify_treaty&#40;treaty&#160;input&#41;
{
&#160;&#160;treaty&#160;treaty_to_present&#160;=&#160;hash&#40;input&#41;;
&#160;&#160;while&#40;!popular_vote&#40;treaty_to_present&#41;&#41;
&#160;&#160;{
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;sleep&#40;BIG_NUMBER&#41;;
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;treaty_to_present&#160;=&#160;cosmetic_rehash&#40;treaty_to_present&#41;;
&#160;&#160;}
&#160;&#160;//&#160;Treaty&#160;accepted!&#160;Never&#160;ask&#160;again!
&#160;&#160;return&#40;true&#41;;
}</div>

<br /><br />
I am neither particularly strongly "pro" or "anti" Europe. Nor do I live in the Republic of Ireland, and so I didn't vote in any <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7454333.stm">referendum</a>; but I am increasingly astounded at the fact that when the EU puts a matter to the public, and it is defeated, they take absolutely <strong>no cognisance of it at all</strong>. They just, rather cynically, accuse the voters of voting on local issues, or not understanding the treaty in front of them, and keep asking the question till they get the answer they want.<br /><br />

Even for strong proponents of the Union, there are a number of rather awkward issues about its future. Its lack of appropriately audited accounts, its apparent lack of basic democratic accountability and so on. It <strong>must not</strong> be seen to routinely ignore its citizens. From what I've heard so far, and in this situation in the past, there seems to be no basic realisation or admission, that the underlying treaty needs to be reworked to be acceptable to its citizens. It's about time the commission listened to rather than lectured, its citizenry. It may only be that small changes need to be made, but some recognition of this would be good. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/53-Catching-up-with-old-friends.html" rel="alternate" title="Catching up with old friends" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-02T13:24:32Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-02T13:24:32Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=53</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=53</wfw:commentRss>
    
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/53-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Catching up with old friends</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Speaking of catching up with old friends, I went to see <a href="http://www.ho66es.com/">Mark Kerr</a> in Belfast last Saturday night. Mark and I know each other well from the old <a href="http://www.fidonet.org/">fidonet</a> days, and I guess we haven't had much contact since I moved to Banbridge, but it was great to see him and his family again. Part of the motivation for that specific timing was another old friend visiting, <a href="http://www.joho.se">JoHo</a>, another veteran of fidonet (in case you didn't know), who was over visiting Ireland (some kind of pilgrimage to Bushmills probably <img src="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" />) with his friend Goran.<br /><br />

Mark had a BBQ on, that we briefly left for a surprising, but really fun diversion (I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you), then we got back, ate a few burgers, drank some wine/coke/whiskey and chattered our way into the small hours. It was really nice to meet up with old friends and meet new people too. I think it's nice that there are some people you can go for years between seeing, but it still feels like old times when you see them again. So I guess it's my turn to come to Sweden again now, Jack. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/52-Email-Latency.html" rel="alternate" title="Email Latency" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-06-02T13:17:38Z</published>
        <updated>2008-06-02T13:45:41Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=52</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=52</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/52-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Email Latency</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Like lots of people who are too hooked into technology for their own good, I tend to receive loads of emails a day, even after the huge quantity of spam is removed. Sometimes it's easy, and fast to respond to a given email. Once in a while I get an email from someone that I really want to respond to in some detail; usually an email from a good friend I don't often see or haven't seen in a while.<br /><br />

Since I'm usually up to my neck in too much stuff, it's precisely this email that I leave to the side to deal with later, "when I have more time". Yes, the people who know me well already understand the problems with that. It would help if icedove stored its tags correctly in my dovecot based IMAP server. but for some reason it often doesn't. The end result is that "later", I'm still struggling to complete a dozen tasks on a list, and the email is anonymously buried in my inbox under many more recent arrivals.<br /><br />

That's really not good, and I'll have to make more of an effort to keep in touch with all these friends. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/51-Runs-on-mailing-lists.html" rel="alternate" title="Runs on mailing lists" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-05-26T20:31:59Z</published>
        <updated>2008-05-26T20:31:59Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=51</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=51</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/51-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Runs on mailing lists</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Today I spent the day at the chemistry department in <a href="http://www.edinburgh.ac.uk">Edinburgh University</a> demonstrating (at their invitation) <a href="http://foss.ulster.ac.uk/projects/opus">OPUS</a> with Ron Laird. I frequently receive these sorts of invitations, and that's nice, but it's a whole day to go there and back again.<br /><br />

I got home and checked my email, and saw dozens of emails about a conference in Japan. It seems the organiser thought it would be a good idea to set-up a mailing list, but hadn't configured it to be read-only. Ok, a pain, and basically spam. Now the real stupidity sets in, when several people start to mail the list to ask to be removed. Ok, more annoyance. Now we get the real fun, computer professionals sending "unsubsribe foo@bar.com" to <strong>the list</strong> (not the list server) so we all get to enjoy that.<br /><br />

I've noticed this cascade effect before, when people start doing this and everyone else gets fed up and starts repeating the mistake, so want off the list; a bit like a run on a bank. But, please people, email the <strong>originator of the spam, not the list</strong> and/or look in the list control lines to find out how to unsubscribe.  
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/49-Interview-with-Alan-Ruddock-and-Henry-Kono.html" rel="alternate" title="Interview with Alan Ruddock and Henry Kono" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-27T19:03:24Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-27T19:03:24Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=49</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=49</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/2-martial-arts" label="martial arts" term="martial arts" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/49-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Interview with Alan Ruddock and Henry Kono</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I spent a pleasant weekend last week in Dublin at <a href="http://www.aikidoinireland.org/admin/dispdojos.php3?dojo_id=36">Fiona's Dojo</a>. It was good to see lots of people, including Aureli, who has started up a <a href="http://www.aikidoinireland.org/admin/dispdojos.php3?dojo_id=51">new dojo</a> in the north west. The course was being given by Alan Ruddock and Henry Kono, and Alan heads the Aiki No Michi, the organisation to which <a href="http://bac.aikidoinireland.org">our club</a> belongs. It was a great course, packed since the space is quite small and lots of people showed up, and we had probably the clearest summary of particular Henry's ideas so far, at least for me. Despite some of Alan's comments I did feel some of that connected to what I do in Iaido, and it's something interesting to look at.<br /><br />

Daithi send an email to some folks after the class, indicated that <a href="http://www.guillaumeerard.com">Guillaume</a> had posted some English versions of an interview he had conducted with <a href="http://www.guillaumeerard.com/aikido/articles/interview-with-henry-kono.html">Henry</a> recently, as well an older interview with <a href="http://www.guillaumeerard.com/aikido/articles/discussion-with-alan-ruddock-the-first-irish-aikido-practitioner-2.html">Alan</a>. Some nice articles, which show an insight into their practice. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/48-Geany-and-other-Development-Tools.html" rel="alternate" title="Geany and other Development Tools" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-26T22:28:17Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-26T22:28:17Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=48</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=48</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/7-programming" label="programming" term="programming" />
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/3-review" label="review" term="review" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/48-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Geany and other Development Tools</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I've tried lots of programming editors and ides over the years, obviously in Unix and Linux this is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming_%28Internet%29#Holy_Wars">Holy War</a>, particularly between the advocates of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi">vi</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs">emacs</a>. It is common for both groups to suggest that the other editor is hopelessly over-complex or clumsy. I think there's some truth in that, because essentially, they both stink.<br /><br />

I tend to be an emacsen user myself, but I just think emacs is slightly less awful than vi. My first action on a new install is usually to use vi to edit my sources.list in Debian, to help me install emacs. Perhaps thats strange, because I really like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sed">sed</a>. So what's the problem with them? They both share this kind of puritanically awkward interface that works well on a console, but sucks in a GUI. They both use ridiculously arcane sequences of key presses to do anything, and I mean even basic stuff like saving and quitting. Yes, yes, you don't have to lecture me about old terminals and their limitations, been there done that, got the t-shirt. I tend to do all my systems maintenance in emacs, but when I'm programming, I've started to love the softness of a decent editor that actually makes it plain and simple to edit multiple buffers of source code, even though its a pain to use different editors for console and gui work. <br /><a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/48-Geany-and-other-Development-Tools.html#extended">Continue reading "Geany and other Development Tools"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/47-Battlestar-Galactica-near-Earth.html" rel="alternate" title="Battlestar Galactica near Earth" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-26T22:08:09Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-26T22:08:09Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=47</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=47</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/47-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Battlestar Galactica near Earth</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                I have to say, I've enjoyed the "re-imagining" of <a href="http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/">Battlestar Galactica</a> immensely so far. When it first aired, I thought it was a pretty corny idea, and didn't watch it, but I watched an odd episode here and there, and I began to realise that this was probably the most slick, dramatic, special effects laden sci-fi show yet. It's very addictive, and one of the <strong>very</strong> few TV shows I feel I don't want to miss an episode of.<br /><br />

Tonight I just sat down to watch season 4, episode 3 (no spoilers, don't worry!), and was very gratified to see Cylon base ships moving in a background that contained <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_%28constellation%29">Orion</a>, absolutely no doubt about it, a nice touch to show Earth is near. Now Orion is the easiest constellation to see, and I admit I never paid attention to the background before, but it's just that kind of nice detail I like about the show. I'll keep looking for more constellations now! 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/46-Wheeler-goes-through-the-last-event-horizon.html" rel="alternate" title="Wheeler goes through the last event horizon" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-18T09:52:58Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-18T09:52:58Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=46</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=46</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/12-STEM" label="STEM" term="STEM" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/46-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Wheeler goes through the last event horizon</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                This week, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Archibald_Wheeler">John Archibald Wheeler</a> died, from pneumonia at the age of 96.<br /><br />

Wheeler was a spectacular physicist, who worked in the areas of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Relativity">General Relativity</a> among other areas, he is the guy who popularised the words "black hole" and "wormhole", and worked with Einstein in his last years. I hadn't known that he had <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7347761.stm">worked on the Manhattan project</a>, and that unlike other scientists, didn't regret his role in the project but merely the fact that it didn't save his brother's life. I also hadn't known that he supervised one of my other great physics heros <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman">Richard Feynman</a>, but I was impressed with his work even before that.<br /><br />

I met his work when I was about 15 or 16. My maths teaching at secondary school had been, well, uneven to say the least for the first few years, but I got a good teacher in 4th and 5th form, Ken Brown. I started to realise that mathematics made logical coherent sense and that if I worked a bit harder I could get on top, and then understanding the next bit took little effort. I also found that, even with this basic mathematics, I could understand a lot of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity">Special Relativity</a> which fascinated me, but not so much as the General theory. In our local library in Bangor I found the book <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gravitation-Physics-Charles-W-Misner/dp/0716703440/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208512393&sr=8-2">Gravitation</a>
by Misner, Thorne, and of course, Wheeler. Now, my memories of this book are old, and I don't have a copy, but nostalgia almost prompts me to buy one. But I can remember my impression of the book.<br /><br />

It's not a layman's account, although there are many good examples of that, but it is beautiful, the illustrations, the mathematics, I enjoyed poring over all of it, and I think I did come to understand the theory better for it, even if the bulk of the material was beyond me then. It inspired me to study physics, and mathematics, and although when I reached university the mathematics itself began to captivate me more than the physics, still, two of my final year modules were Quantum Mechanics and Tensor Field Theory (the mathematical basis for General Relativity). In fact, I picked these out as modules I wanted to do when I was in first year, and planned everything around them. In the end I am more of a Pure Mathematician, and though back in school I always wanted to work on GR I guess it's very unlikely I now ever will, it was an inspiration to me, and people like Einstein, Feynman and Wheeler showed the way.

 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/45-Fixing-truncated-printing-with-Firefox.html" rel="alternate" title="Fixing truncated printing with Firefox" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-16T22:18:50Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-16T22:18:50Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=45</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=45</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/8-php" label="php" term="php" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/45-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Fixing truncated printing with Firefox</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                A while ago, I discovered that my current main development project <a href="http://foss.ulster.ac.uk/projects/opus/">OPUS</a> had an odd problem when printing out of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_%28layout_engine%29">gecko</a> based browser.<br /><br />

It would print the first page, whether in portrait or landscape, and if there was more content, it would be abruptly truncated and the second page would contain merely the footer off the page. I've been meaning to try and solve the problem with a print stylesheet for a while and finally did so today. <br /><a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/45-Fixing-truncated-printing-with-Firefox.html#extended">Continue reading "Fixing truncated printing with Firefox"</a>
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/44-Tux-droid-isnt-free.html" rel="alternate" title="Tux droid isn't free" />
        <author>
            <name>Colin Turner</name>
                    </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-15T15:11:25Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-15T15:11:25Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=44</wfw:comment>
    
        <wfw:commentRss>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=44</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/categories/11-Free-Software" label="Free Software" term="Free Software" />
    
        <id>http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/44-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Tux droid isn't free</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Ok, so I should have checked an odd message I saw when I installed the 32 bit debs, but now I know that <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/36-Tuxdroid-with-Debian-lennytesting.html#extended">tux droid</a> is not entirely free.<br /><br />

As some of you will know I've had some spectacular bad luck with failing hardware both at <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/39-ASUS-P5KC-Memory-PSU-Problems.html">home</a> and at <a href="http://www.piglets.org/serendipity/archives/40-Marvell-Technology-88SE6121-SATA-II-Controller.html">work </a> recently. A few weeks ago I started to see the worrying signs of impending catastrophic disk failure on imladris. I bought a new SATA disk, and figured I might as well install an amd64 system (I was previous running an amd64 kernel with a completely 32 bit userland). The process went nice and smoothly (the Debian installer is so much better than it was 3 - 4 years ago). I'm still installing bits and pieces that have been forgotten, and I still have some other problems (can't listen to iplayer radio for example).<br /><br />

Today I resolved to reinstall the manager for tux, and found that the .deb files were available only for i386. Not daunted, I happily downloaded the tarballs to compile, but got lots of errors clearly stemming from a 32 bit / 64 bit mismatch. I found a <a href="http://www.tuxisalive.com/tux-droid-forum/copy_of_forumtopic1/768974438">forum</a> article discussing a library that was packaged in i386 (why?) and downloaded the source and recompiled it for 64 bit. The same message persists, and then I <a href="http://www.tuxisalive.com/tux-droid-forum/copy_of_forumtopic1/144054561">found</a> an unhappier thread. It looks like the whole project is using a closed source text to speech (TTS) system.<br /><br />

They are apparently producing a 64 bit version, but it kind of defeats the point... a poster boy product for an open source operating system, and parts of it are closed. Even if it can be compiled for i386 and amd64, what about the rest?




 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>

</feed>